Search for: "Hand Held Products, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 2,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2017, 9:11 pm
Amgen Inc., the Supreme Court handed down its interpretation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA") for the approval of biosimilar drugs. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:07 am
A United Kingdom based company, BrainScope Company, Inc., is working on a new product which would assist in the early diagnosis of brain injuries. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:42 am
Apr. 14, 2017)Pulse was formed to develop a product that can measure aldehyde molecules in human breath via a non-invasive hand-held device. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:37 pm
Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:53 am
A similar decision was handed down by the same court in another recent product liability lawsuit, Solari v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:44 pm
Federal courts have long held that a sophisticated user of a product does not need to be warned of the products potential to cause harm. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
” It is a blue and gray, hand-held garment iron that converts to a garment steamer. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:54 am
Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 11:13 am
Sun Ergoline, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:51 am
Court of Appeals in Cincinnati has held. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:46 am
Andrews in Hand Held Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Generally speaking, under the Restatement (Second) of Torts analysis, manufacturer defendants are held to be strictly liable for any manufacturing defects in their products. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
The court’s decision in Viamedia, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
The court’s decision in Viamedia, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:53 pm
The Court held that the economic loss rule, which prohibits damages in tort for purely economic losses, only applies in the product liability context and thus answers the certified question in the negative. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am
In what should come as a welcome decision for brand owners, the Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd unanimously overturning the decision of the Court of Appeal, and restoring the first instance order of Kitchin J. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am
Johns-Mansville Products Corporation.[1] Without a record of what was known or knowable, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that defendants that sold asbestos-containing products without warning of the products’ latent hazards would be liable even when the hazards were “undiscoverable” at the time of marketing.[2] This holding was based upon a trial court record devoid of the state-of-art defense. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
